Gemma Derrick

58 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Gemma Derrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Health Informatics 45
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 179
  • Management Science and Operations Research 136
  • Information Systems and Management 67
  • General Health Professions 159
Replace María Nedeva with:
María Nedeva United Kingdom
Ho Fai Chan Australia
Emanuela Reale Italy
Marco Seeber Belgium
Alfredo Yegros Spain
Catherine P. Slade United States
Grégoire Mallard Switzerland
Ian McNay United Kingdom
Laura Cruz Castro Spain
Claire Donovan United Kingdom
Gemma Derrick relative to María Nedeva United Kingdom María Nedeva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
María Nedeva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Derrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Derrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Derrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Derrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Derrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Derrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Derrick. The network helps show where Gemma Derrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Derrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Derrick Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Derrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201674
2 201571
3 201271
4 201162
5 201160
6 201644
7 201141
8 201839
9 201836
10 201336
11 201930
12 202130
13 201329
14 201223
15 201423
16 201823
17 201922
18 201720
19
Invisible Intermediaries: A Systematic Review into the Role of Research Management in University and Institutional Research Processes
201419
20 201917

About Gemma Derrick

Gemma Derrick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 63 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (13 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (4 papers) and Higher Education Governance and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (45 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (179 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (136 citations), Information Systems and Management (67 citations) and General Health Professions (159 citations). Gemma Derrick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gabrielle Samuel, Abby Haynes, Wayne Hall, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk, James Gillespie, Sally Redman, Vincenzo Pavone, Thed N. van Leeuwen and Koen Jonkers. Their work appears in journals such as Research Evaluation, Nature, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Palgrave Communications and Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact