Gemma Catney

873 citations
41 papers · 622 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Catney

37 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Gemma Catney
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Urban Studies 118
  • Transportation 88
  • Health 85
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 418
Replace Wenfei Winnie Wang with:
Wenfei Winnie Wang United Kingdom
Joos Droogleever Fortuijn Netherlands
Dewi Owen United Kingdom
Stefanie Kley Germany
Fenne M. Pinkster Netherlands
Aude Bernard Australia
Lina Hedman Sweden
Kumiko Shibuya Hong Kong
S. de Vos Netherlands
Karen Haandrikman Sweden
Gemma Catney relative to Wenfei Winnie Wang United Kingdom Wenfei Winnie Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Wenfei Winnie Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Catney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Catney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Catney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Catney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Catney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Catney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Catney. The network helps show where Gemma Catney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Catney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Catney Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Catney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201281
2 201164
3 201560
4 201055
5 201546
6 201743
7 201728
8 202326
9 201921
10 202120
11 201819
12 201818
13 201514
14 202014
15 201812
16 202011
17 201810
18
Has Neighbourhood Ethnic Segregation Decreased
20139
19
Ethnic minority disadvantage in the labour market
20159
20 20138

About Gemma Catney

Gemma Catney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Demography, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (27 papers), Rural development and sustainability (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (8 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (7 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (7 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (7 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (118 citations), Transportation (88 citations), Health (85 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (77 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (418 citations). Gemma Catney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Aileen Stockdale, Ludi Simpson, Christopher Lloyd, Diane Frost, Fay H. Johnston, Mark Ellis, Dermot O’Reilly, Richard Wright, Michael Rosato and Albert Sabater. Their work appears in journals such as Population Space and Place, Geographical Journal, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies and Urban Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact