G.E. Staddon

36 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

G.E. Staddon
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Internal Medicine 133
  • Equine 51
  • Small Animals 78
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 39
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 106
Replace William C. Woolverton with:
William C. Woolverton United States
Hinshaw Lb United States
C. A. Guenter United States
Abner Golden United States
Ronald E. Bowers United States
Atsumori Hamahata Japan
Dennis Battock United States
S Forconi Italy
P. Van der Linden Belgium
Yasuhiro Tanabe Japan
G.E. Staddon relative to William C. Woolverton United States William C. Woolverton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
William C. Woolverton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.E. Staddon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.E. Staddon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.E. Staddon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.E. Staddon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.E. Staddon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.E. Staddon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.E. Staddon. The network helps show where G.E. Staddon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.E. Staddon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.E. Staddon Line = papers co-authored together G.E. Staddon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974113
2 199481
3 199146
4 198442
5 197442
6 197524
7 200124
8 198617
9 197417
10 197916
11 198514
12 199513
13 199013
14 198113
15 198910
16 19948
17 19728
18 19737
19 19727
20 19817

About G.E. Staddon

G.E. Staddon is a scholar working on Small Animals, Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (10 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (3 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (133 citations), Equine (51 citations), Small Animals (78 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (39 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (106 citations). G.E. Staddon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include B.M.Q. Weaver, P. C. Jackson, M. J. F. Fordyce, E. Rhys Davies, AS Baker, Iain W. McCall, W.G.J. Hampson, F. Carswell, Somnath Mukhopadhyay and Mary J. Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Age and Ageing, Equine Veterinary Journal, Research in Veterinary Science and Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact