Gary Laderman

600 citations
24 papers · 336 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Gary Laderman

21 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Gary Laderman
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Health 132
  • Clinical Psychology 109
  • Infectious Diseases 49
  • General Health Professions 65
  • Anthropology 26
Replace Zachary Gussow with:
Zachary Gussow United States
Lonzozou Kpanake Canada
Cristina Herrera Mexico
Emily Wentzell United States
Keith V. Bletzer United States
Ciann Wilson Canada
James R. Cochrane South Africa
Fay Dennis United Kingdom
Emma Wilson United Kingdom
Stephen Donaldson United Kingdom
Gary Laderman relative to Zachary Gussow United States Zachary Gussow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Zachary Gussow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gary Laderman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary Laderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary Laderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary Laderman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary Laderman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary Laderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary Laderman. The network helps show where Gary Laderman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Gary Laderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gary Laderman Line = papers co-authored together Gary Laderman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200986
2 201046
3 199744
4 201242
5 200523
6
The Sacred Remains
199618
7 199915
8 200112
9 200011
10 20179
11 19946
12 19955
13
Bridging the Two Cultures: A Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Approach to Teaching and Learning Science in a Societal Context.
20054
14 19944
15 20014
16 20062
17
Religion and American cultures : tradition, diversity, and popular expression
20151
18 19971
19 20071
20 20151

About Gary Laderman

Gary Laderman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, History, Philosophy and Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (132 citations), Clinical Psychology (109 citations), Infectious Diseases (49 citations), General Health Professions (65 citations) and Anthropology (26 citations). Gary Laderman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Safiya George Dalmida, Colleen DiIorio, Marcia McDonnell Holstad, Lisa M Wilson, Peter G. Filene, Robert V. Wells, Arri Eisen, Luis de León and Carole Haber. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Journal of Religion and Health and Journal of the Early Republic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact