Luis de León

627 citations
45 papers · 427 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Luis de León

33 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Luis de León
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Mechanical Engineering 251
  • Religious studies 27
  • Literature and Literary Theory 47
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 41
  • Biomedical Engineering 149
Replace W. R. Johnson with:
W. R. Johnson United States
John Considine United States
Michaël Fontaine France
Peter Gilles Luxembourg
Nicholas Driver United Kingdom
Hans Andersson Sweden
Tom Whittaker United Kingdom
Shuang Chen China
Tomomi Yamaguchi Japan
Hartmut Hoffmann Germany
Luis de León relative to W. R. Johnson United States W. R. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
W. R. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis de León

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis de León's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis de León with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis de León more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis de León

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis de León. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis de León. The network helps show where Luis de León may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Luis de León, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis de León Line = papers co-authored together Luis de León links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200882
2 201139
3 200836
4 201431
5 201027
6
La perfecta casada
196326
7 200826
8
De los nombres de Cristo
197723
9 200515
10 200014
11 199913
12 200911
13 201010
14 20098
15
Obras completas castellanas de Fray Luis de León
19576
16 20096
17 20086
18 20106
19 20105
20 20104

About Luis de León

Luis de León is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Mechanical Engineering, History, Biomedical Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced machining processes and optimization (16 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (11 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (7 papers), Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (6 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (4 papers) and Tunneling and Rock Mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (251 citations), Religious studies (27 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (47 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (41 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (149 citations). Luis de León has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Berend Denkena, David Boehnke, Bo Wang, Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Satyajit Gupta, Michael C. Biewer, Qian Zhang, J.R. Yates, Mahdi Mahfouf and Richard Greene. Their work appears in journals such as Production Engineering, International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, American Quarterly, MLN and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact