Garnet E. Peck

3.2k citations
112 papers · 2.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Garnet E. Peck

109 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Garnet E. Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Pharmaceutical Science 1.2k
  • Analytical Chemistry 537
  • Biomaterials 473
  • Biophysics 147
  • Molecular Medicine 92
Replace Colin D. Melia with:
Colin D. Melia United Kingdom
S. Wartewig Germany
Katsuhide Terada Japan
Jyrki Heinämäki Finland
C. T. Rhodes United States
Etsuo Yonemochi Japan
Munir Hussain United States
Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh Belgium
Graham Buckton United Kingdom
Fridrun Podczeck United Kingdom
Garnet E. Peck relative to Colin D. Melia United Kingdom Colin D. Melia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Colin D. Melia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Garnet E. Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Garnet E. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Garnet E. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Garnet E. Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Garnet E. Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Garnet E. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Garnet E. Peck. The network helps show where Garnet E. Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Garnet E. Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Garnet E. Peck Line = papers co-authored together Garnet E. Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996334
2 2001297
3 2001218
4 200595
5 200593
6 197890
7 200470
8 199366
9 200562
10 199853
11 200447
12 198747
13 198446
14 199242
15 200040
16 200838
17 199036
18 199436
19 200335
20 199634

About Garnet E. Peck

Garnet E. Peck is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Analytical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (37 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (18 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (6 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (6 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers) and Food composition and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (1.2k citations), Analytical Chemistry (537 citations), Biomaterials (473 citations), Biophysics (147 citations) and Molecular Medicine (92 citations). Garnet E. Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth R. Morris, Satit Puttipipatkhachorn, Jurairat Nunthanid, Dane O. Kildsig, Keiji Yamamoto, Ronald W. Miller, Abhay Gupta, Gilbert S. Banker, Kouji Yamamoto and Luk Chiu Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Journal of Controlled Release.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact