Garnet E. Peck

3.1k citations
109 papers · 2.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Garnet E. Peck

106 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Garnet E. Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Pharmaceutical Science 1.1k
  • Analytical Chemistry 525
  • Biomaterials 442
  • Biophysics 137
  • Spectroscopy 284
Replace Colin D. Melia with:
Colin D. Melia United Kingdom
S. Wartewig Germany
Jyrki Heinämäki Finland
C. T. Rhodes United States
Katsuhide Terada Japan
Etsuo Yonemochi Japan
Fridrun Podczeck United Kingdom
Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh Belgium
Munir Hussain United States
Paul J. Sheskey United States
Garnet E. Peck relative to Colin D. Melia United Kingdom Colin D. Melia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Colin D. Melia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Garnet E. Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Garnet E. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Garnet E. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Garnet E. Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Garnet E. Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Garnet E. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Garnet E. Peck. The network helps show where Garnet E. Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Garnet E. Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Garnet E. Peck Line = papers co-authored together Garnet E. Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996318
2 2001278
3 2001207
4 200587
5 200587
6 197883
7 200464
8 199362
9 200559
10 199852
11 200445
12 198745
13 198444
14 199241
15 200040
16 200836
17 199035
18 199434
19 200333
20 198132

About Garnet E. Peck

Garnet E. Peck is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Analytical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (37 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (18 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (15 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (7 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Food composition and properties (5 papers) and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (1.1k citations), Analytical Chemistry (525 citations), Biomaterials (442 citations), Biophysics (137 citations) and Spectroscopy (284 citations). Garnet E. Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Satit Puttipipatkhachorn, Jurairat Nunthanid, Kenneth R. Morris, Keiji Yamamoto, Dane O. Kildsig, Ronald W. Miller, Abhay Gupta, Gilbert S. Banker, Kouji Yamamoto and Kenneth R. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Journal of Controlled Release.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact