Gail J. Mitchell

125 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Gail J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Research and Theory 130
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 153
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 76
  • Conservation 168
  • General Health Professions 776
Replace Rosemarie Rizzo Parse with:
Rosemarie Rizzo Parse United States
Margaret McAllister Australia
Jean Watson United States
Jean Watson United States
Nancy Drew United States
Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom
Joanne Olson Canada
Theodore Stickley United Kingdom
Hildegard E. Peplau United States
Gerard Fealy Ireland
Gail J. Mitchell relative to Rosemarie Rizzo Parse United States Rosemarie Rizzo Parse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Rosemarie Rizzo Parse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail J. Mitchell. The network helps show where Gail J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gail J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Gail J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199988
2 200974
3 200273
4 201572
5 200668
6 199366
7 201662
8 201061
9 199260
10 200647
11 201145
12 201345
13 201845
14 201044
15 201144
16 199842
17 201233
18 200228
19 200328
20 200228

About Gail J. Mitchell

Gail J. Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Conservation, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (15 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (11 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (11 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (7 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (130 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (153 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (76 citations), Conservation (168 citations) and General Health Professions (776 citations). Gail J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pia Kontos, Christine Jonas‐Simpson, William K. Cody, Sherry L. Dupuis, Karen‐Lee Miller, Debra A. Bournes, F. Beryl Pilkington, Julia Gray, Jennifer Carson and Cheryl Cott. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Science Quarterly, Dementia, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Canadian Theatre Review and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact