G Satta

137 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

G Satta
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Molecular Medicine 703
  • Endocrinology 303
  • Clinical Biochemistry 301
  • Infectious Diseases 773
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64
Replace Neville Firth with:
Neville Firth Australia
E. Collatz France
Susumu Mitsuhashi Japan
Abigail A. Salyers United States
Michael A. Lobritz United States
Laura M. McMurry United States
Dean L. Shinabarger United States
Michael N. Alekshun United States
Stephan Fuchs Germany
Stephen M. Kwong Australia
G Satta relative to Neville Firth Australia Neville Firth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Neville Firth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G Satta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G Satta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Satta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Satta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G Satta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Satta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Satta. The network helps show where G Satta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G Satta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G Satta Line = papers co-authored together G Satta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 141 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991162
2 1990120
3
Antibiotic treatment for pelvic infection.
1987102
4 200295
5 199488
6 198581
7 198981
8 198881
9
Comparative effects of L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine and 5'-methylthioadenosine on the growth of preneoplastic lesions and DNA methylation in rat liver during the early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis.
199274
10 199371
11 199070
12 199653
13 199550
14 199545
15 197945
16 199343
17 199541
18 198240
19 198037
20 198636

About G Satta

G Satta is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases and Ecology, having authored 141 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (37 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (25 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (22 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (21 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (20 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (11 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (11 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (703 citations), Endocrinology (303 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (301 citations), Infectious Diseases (773 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (64 citations). G Satta has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Pietro Canepari, Roberta Fontana, Pietro E. Varaldo, Gian María Rossolini, Maria M. Lleò, Orietta Massidda, Giuseppe Cornaglia, Renato Fontana, Marzia Boaretti and Roberto Fontana. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Infection and Immunity and The Journal of Antibiotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact