G. Hof

1.0k citations
34 papers · 780 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

G. Hof

33 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

G. Hof
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 530
  • Animal Science and Zoology 189
  • Genetics 255
  • Forestry 27
  • Small Animals 47
Replace Lizhi Wang with:
Lizhi Wang China
N. A. MacLeod United Kingdom
Thomas G. Jenkins United States
Gary M Davenport United States
W. H. Hale United States
Haixia Sun China
J.H. Clark United States
S.K. Gulati Australia
Luis Corona Mexico
P.W. Jardon United States
G. Hof relative to Lizhi Wang China Lizhi Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lizhi Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hof. The network helps show where G. Hof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Hof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Hof Line = papers co-authored together G. Hof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997147
2 1990134
3 1998109
4 1986107
5 198833
6 198431
7 199424
8 199123
9 199816
10 199415
11 199415
12 199513
13 198913
14 199011
15 19919
16 19868
17 19938
18 19938
19 19907
20
Effect of particle size, cold pelleting, steam pelleting and expander treatment on the rumen degradability of a compound feed for ruminants.
19966

About G. Hof

G. Hof is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Genetics, Spectroscopy and Radiation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (16 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (8 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers) and Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (530 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (189 citations), Genetics (255 citations), Forestry (27 citations) and Small Animals (47 citations). G. Hof has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include S. Tamminga, D.G. Grieve, S. Korver, J.O. Goelema, A.F.B. van der Poel, M.A.M. Spreeuwenberg, Y N Joshi, A. J. J. Raassen, P H M Uylings and A. Steg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Journal of Dairy Science, Animal Feed Science and Technology, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Poultry Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact