Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
1.1k papers
receiving
25.7k citations
Peers
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty1.6k
Radiation1.8k
Ceramics and Composites934
Orthodontics593
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics4.6k
Replace Contemporary Physics with:
Contemporary PhysicsUnited Kingdom
Computing in Science & EngineeringUnited States
Topics in applied physicsUnited States
StrainUnited Kingdom
Applied Spectroscopy ReviewsUnited States
Comptes Rendus PhysiqueFrance
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering DesignUnited Kingdom
Applied Mechanics ReviewsUnited States
Advances in polymer scienceGermany
npj Computational MaterialsUnited States
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technologyrelative toContemporary PhysicsUnited KingdomContemporary Physics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
Contemporary Physics · 1×
×4.42k/351SPU
×1.42k/1kRADIA
×0.5934/2kCC
×12593/51ORTHO
×0.35k/17kAMPO
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
About Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 27.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (148 papers), Radiation (164 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (44 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (144 papers) specifically the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (133 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (99 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (93 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (63 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (60 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (42 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (41 papers) and X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are R. G. Munro, John S. Villarrubia, Chiara F. Ferraris, C. A. Angell, M. R. Vanlandingham, Craig M. Shakarji, John Slotwinski, Michael P. Unterweger, Larry L. Lucas and Andrew N. Fitch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.