Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
1.1k papers
receiving
24.1k citations
Peers
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty1.5k
Radiation1.7k
Ceramics and Composites886
Orthodontics622
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics4.3k
Replace Contemporary Physics with:
Contemporary PhysicsUnited Kingdom
Computing in Science & EngineeringUnited States
EngineeringChina
StrainUnited Kingdom
Applied Spectroscopy ReviewsUnited States
Comptes Rendus PhysiqueFrance
Applied Mechanics ReviewsUnited States
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering DesignUnited Kingdom
npj Computational MaterialsUnited States
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials ScienceUnited States
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technologyrelative toContemporary PhysicsUnited KingdomContemporary Physics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.4×
Contemporary Physics · 1×
×4.51k/324SPU
×1.52k/1kRADIA
×0.5886/2kCC
×12622/50ORTHO
×0.34k/16kAMPO
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
About Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (148 papers), Radiation (162 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (209 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (43 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (143 papers) specifically the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (133 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (98 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (91 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (62 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (59 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (42 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (41 papers) and X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are R. G. Munro, John S. Villarrubia, Chiara F. Ferraris, C. A. Angell, M. R. Vanlandingham, Craig M. Shakarji, Michael P. Unterweger, John Slotwinski, Larry L. Lucas and Andrew N. Fitch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.