G. Ernsting

1.1k citations
37 papers · 922 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

G. Ernsting

37 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

G. Ernsting
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 455
  • Insect Science 226
  • Ecology 430
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 161
  • Ecological Modeling 46
Replace Elisabeth Hornung with:
Elisabeth Hornung Hungary
Charles E. King United States
A. T. Strathdee United Kingdom
John B. Gentry United States
Wendy Van Doorslaer Belgium
Kenneth O. Spence United States
Roswitha B. Ehnes Germany
Duncan A. Mackay Australia
C. Barry Knisley United States
Rogério Parentoni Martins Brazil
G. Ernsting relative to Elisabeth Hornung Hungary Elisabeth Hornung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Elisabeth Hornung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Ernsting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Ernsting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Ernsting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Ernsting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Ernsting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Ernsting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Ernsting. The network helps show where G. Ernsting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside G. Ernsting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Ernsting Line = papers co-authored together G. Ernsting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199282
2 199780
3 200071
4 201068
5 199545
6 199644
7 199341
8 200339
9 199235
10 197435
11 199133
12 198833
13 199931
14 199326
15 200223
16 197822
17 200421
18 197720
19 198420
20 198820

About G. Ernsting

G. Ernsting is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (455 citations), Insect Science (226 citations), Ecology (430 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (161 citations) and Ecological Modeling (46 citations). G. Ernsting has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Isaaks, William Block, Nico M. van Straalen, G.W. Korthals, Els N. G. Joosse, Bert van der Werf, A.W.G. van der Wurff, Rieta Gols, Matty P. Berg and R. van Treuren. Their work appears in journals such as Oecologia, Ecological Entomology, Pedobiologia, Polar Biology and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact