G. Eckstein

20 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

G. Eckstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Bioengineering 244
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 464
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 220
  • Biomedical Engineering 496
  • Electrochemistry 59
Replace Robert J. Huber with:
Robert J. Huber United States
Peter Douwe van der Wal Switzerland
Christian Bergaud France
Jer‐Chyi Wang Taiwan
Elisabet Prats‐Alfonso Spain
Jeffrey Abbott United States
Michele Di Lauro Italy
Chi‐Yuan Yang Sweden
Vanessa Maybeck Germany
Julia Ehrlich United States
G. Eckstein relative to Robert J. Huber United States Robert J. Huber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert J. Huber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Eckstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Eckstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Eckstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Eckstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Eckstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Eckstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Eckstein. The network helps show where G. Eckstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Eckstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Eckstein Line = papers co-authored together G. Eckstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2003335
2 2003199
3 2003145
4 200753
5 201152
6 200452
7 200249
8 200735
9 200325
10 196919
11 201019
12 200617
13 197215
14 200615
15 199913
16 200410
17 20067
18 19986
19 19685
20 19733

About G. Eckstein

G. Eckstein is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Biomedical Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (3 papers), Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies (3 papers) and Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (244 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (464 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations), Biomedical Engineering (496 citations) and Electrochemistry (59 citations). G. Eckstein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Schreiter, Reinhard Gabl, R. Thewes, Christian Paulus, Birgit Holzapfl, Franz Bruno Hofmann, Björn Eversmann, Peter Fromherz, Martin Jenkner and Ralf Brederlow. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (b), Sensors and Actuators A Physical, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biosensors and Bioelectronics and Solid State Ionics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact