G. Drees

482 citations
22 papers · 360 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes 6
    • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair 4
    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices 9

G. Drees

18 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

G. Drees
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 133
  • Emergency Medicine 51
  • Transplantation 15
  • Surgery 194
  • Biomedical Engineering 204
Replace Deon W. Vigilance with:
Deon W. Vigilance United States
Kavous Hakim‐Meibodi Germany
Sarah Schettle United States
Ali N. Ibrahimiye United States
L R McBride United States
Juan P. Umaña Colombia
Dietmar Böthig Germany
VT Tsang United Kingdom
Deirdre J. Epstein United States
Antigone Koliopoulou United States
G. Drees relative to Deon W. Vigilance United States Deon W. Vigilance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Deon W. Vigilance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Drees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Drees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Drees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Drees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Drees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Drees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Drees. The network helps show where G. Drees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Drees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Drees Line = papers co-authored together G. Drees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200579
2 200556
3 201043
4 200532
5 200430
6 199926
7 201121
8 200617
9 200616
10 199613
11 20058
12 20068
13 20054
14 20072
15 20042
16 20101
17 20091
18 20021
19 20100
20 20020

About G. Drees

G. Drees is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (6 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (133 citations), Emergency Medicine (51 citations), Transplantation (15 citations), Surgery (194 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (204 citations). G. Drees has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include T. D. T. Tjan, Hans H. Scheld, Markus Rothenburger, A. Hoffmeier, C. G. Schmidt, Wilfried Roethy, Georg Wieselthaler, Kurt Laederach, Brigitta Bunzel and Christian D. Etz. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Circulation, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Transplantation Proceedings and Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact