G. Charbit

1.1k citations
34 papers · 969 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

G. Charbit

34 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

G. Charbit
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Pharmaceutical Science 204
  • Biomedical Engineering 513
  • Drug Discovery 2
  • Water Science and Technology 90
  • Biomaterials 44
Replace Stuart J. Macnaughton with:
Stuart J. Macnaughton Australia
Xiang‐Ping Kong China
Jianchang Xu China
Mousa A. Allam Egypt
Audrey Drelich France
Aye Aye Myint South Korea
Chandrasekhar Garlapati India
Jiahui Hu China
Xiaotong Zhang China
Miriam Biasizzo Italy
G. Charbit relative to Stuart J. Macnaughton Australia Stuart J. Macnaughton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Stuart J. Macnaughton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Charbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Charbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Charbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Charbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Charbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Charbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Charbit. The network helps show where G. Charbit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside G. Charbit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Charbit Line = papers co-authored together G. Charbit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200695
2 200180
3 200562
4 200060
5 200059
6 199958
7 199951
8 200950
9 200948
10 200344
11 200239
12 200538
13 200335
14 199828
15 199825
16 199720
17 200319
18 200418
19 198416
20 198516

About G. Charbit

G. Charbit is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Pharmaceutical Science, Water Science and Technology, Organic Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (12 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (6 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (5 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers), Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes (3 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (3 papers), Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements (2 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (204 citations), Biomedical Engineering (513 citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations), Water Science and Technology (90 citations) and Biomaterials (44 citations). G. Charbit has collaborated with scholars based in France and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth Badens, F. Charbit, Olivier Boutin, Christelle Crampon, Pierrette Guichardon, Géza Horváth, Évelyne Neau, Christophe Joussot-Dubien, Zahra Sadaoui and E. Carretier. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN and Fluid Phase Equilibria.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact