Fushi Ke

837 citations
12 papers · 625 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Fushi Ke

12 papers receiving 616 citations

Fushi Ke's Hit Papers

A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification 2013 · 462 citations
4620+4+8Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Fushi Ke
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Insect Science 273
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
  • Genetics 154
  • Molecular Biology 322
  • Ecological Modeling 17
Replace Jianlin Bai with:
Jianlin Bai China
尤燕春 China
Miao Xie China
Marion Orsucci France
Keira J. Lucas United States
Catherine M. Ward United States
Paul Battlay Australia
Héloïse Bastide France
Alex S. Torson United States
Ze Zhang China
Fushi Ke relative to Jianlin Bai China Jianlin Bai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jianlin Bai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fushi Ke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fushi Ke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fushi Ke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fushi Ke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fushi Ke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fushi Ke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fushi Ke. The network helps show where Fushi Ke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fushi Ke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fushi Ke Line = papers co-authored together Fushi Ke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification
Hit paper breakdown →
2013462
2 202066
3 202146
4 202121
5 20245
6 20245
7 20135
8 20195
9 20173
10 20153
11 20223
12
Spatiotemporal dynamics of genetic variation in populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in China.
20191

About Fushi Ke

Fushi Ke is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Horticulture, having authored 12 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (273 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations), Genetics (154 citations), Molecular Biology (322 citations) and Ecological Modeling (17 citations). Fushi Ke has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Liette Vasseur, Shijun You, Min-Sheng You, Jacques Régnière, Yanting Chen, Shaoping Chen, Zhaoxia Liu, Geoff M. Gurr, Jian Lin and Shiguo Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Ecology and Evolution, Insects, Scientific Reports and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact