Fu‐Ming Kuo

559 citations
8 papers · 489 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Synthesis and biological activity
    • Click Chemistry and Applications
    • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
    • Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles
    • Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
  • Toxicology top 5%
    • Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents

Papers in

    • Synthesis and biological activity 4
    • Click Chemistry and Applications 3
    • Quinazolinone synthesis and applications 1
    • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 2

Fu‐Ming Kuo

7 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Fu‐Ming Kuo
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Organic Chemistry 406
  • Toxicology 44
  • Pharmacology 82
  • Oncology 56
  • Molecular Biology 135
Replace Jérémie Fournier Dit Chabert with:
Jérémie Fournier Dit Chabert France
Ashish Radadiya India
Mahamadhanif S. Shaikh South Africa
Dhanushya Gopal United States
Santanu Hati India
María Kimatrai Salvador Italy
Yeh-Long Chen Taiwan
Giuseppina Grisolia Italy
Vangala Santhosh Reddy India
Chandan Kishor India
Fu‐Ming Kuo relative to Jérémie Fournier Dit Chabert France Jérémie Fournier Dit Chabert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Jérémie Fournier Dit Chabert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fu‐Ming Kuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fu‐Ming Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fu‐Ming Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fu‐Ming Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fu‐Ming Kuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fu‐Ming Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fu‐Ming Kuo. The network helps show where Fu‐Ming Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fu‐Ming Kuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fu‐Ming Kuo Line = papers co-authored together Fu‐Ming Kuo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2004140
2 2010138
3 200485
4 200982
5 201930
6 20209
7 20125
8 20250

About Fu‐Ming Kuo

Fu‐Ming Kuo is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Immunology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and biological activity (4 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (1 paper), Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation (1 paper), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (406 citations), Toxicology (44 citations), Pharmacology (82 citations), Oncology (56 citations) and Molecular Biology (135 citations). Fu‐Ming Kuo has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, India and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Hsing‐Pang Hsieh, Chun-Wei Chang, Jang‐Yang Chang, Jing‐Ping Liou, Chi-Yen Chang, Mohane Selvaraj Coumar, Shiow‐Ju Lee, Yung‐Ning Yang, Neeraj Mahindroo and Hui-Yi Shiao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic Chemistry and ChemMedChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact