Friedrich Stricker

706 citations
25 papers · 559 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Friedrich Stricker

25 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Friedrich Stricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 202
  • Materials Chemistry 400
  • Biomaterials 110
  • Organic Chemistry 201
  • Polymers and Plastics 40
Replace Kyle D. Clark with:
Kyle D. Clark United States
Evgenii Titov Germany
Sebastian Ulrich Switzerland
Vince Tropepe Canada
F. Terao Japan
Saemi Oh United States
Naoko Ojima Japan
Alex Oppermann Germany
Sebastian Fredrich Germany
Sarah L. Walden Australia
Friedrich Stricker relative to Kyle D. Clark United States Kyle D. Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kyle D. Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Stricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Stricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Stricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Stricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Stricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Stricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Stricker. The network helps show where Friedrich Stricker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Friedrich Stricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Friedrich Stricker Line = papers co-authored together Friedrich Stricker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018146
2 201654
3 202249
4 202048
5 202141
6 201929
7 202428
8 202221
9 202319
10 202218
11 201613
12 202113
13 202312
14 202312
15 202111
16 20228
17 20217
18 20227
19 20226
20 20225

About Friedrich Stricker

Friedrich Stricker is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (14 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (6 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (5 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (5 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (5 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (3 papers) and Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (202 citations), Materials Chemistry (400 citations), Biomaterials (110 citations), Organic Chemistry (201 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (40 citations). Friedrich Stricker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Javier Read de Alaniz, Kyle D. Clark, Craig J. Hawker, Neil D. Dolinski, Miranda M. Sroda, Zachariah A. Page, James R. Hemmer, Julie Peterson, Pol Besenius and Lars Schmüser. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Langmuir, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Nature Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact