Fredric E. Rose

16 papers receiving 866 citations

Peers

Fredric E. Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental Neuroscience 504
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 166
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Social Psychology 55
Replace Anna Yam with:
Anna Yam United States
Kristen E. Sheau United States
Célia Maria Giacheti Brazil
Dean D’Souza United Kingdom
Nicole Crocker United States
Anne V. Snow United States
Nina Lisofsky Germany
Jesse Le Roy Conel United States
Johanna Sigl‐Glöckner Germany
Alex Thomson United Kingdom
Fredric E. Rose relative to Anna Yam United States Anna Yam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Anna Yam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fredric E. Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fredric E. Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredric E. Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredric E. Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fredric E. Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredric E. Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredric E. Rose. The network helps show where Fredric E. Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fredric E. Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fredric E. Rose Line = papers co-authored together Fredric E. Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2004228
2 200396
3 200494
4 200489
5 200574
6 200055
7 200653
8 200652
9 199547
10 200339
11 200731
12 198912
13 200212
14 19979
15 20102
16 19971

About Fredric E. Rose

Fredric E. Rose is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 16 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Williams Syndrome Research (9 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (1 paper) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (504 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (166 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations) and Social Psychology (55 citations). Fredric E. Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Bellugi, Allan L. Reiss, Yvonne M. Searcy, Alan J. Lincoln, Albert M. Galaburda, Mark A. Eckert, Julie R. Korenberg, Asya Karchemskiy, Shelli R. Kesler and Hower Kwon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Journal of Vision, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Assessment and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact