Anna Yam
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Williams Syndrome Research
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
Papers in
-
- Williams Syndrome Research 7
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 3
- Co-authors
- Michael Marsiske (7 shared papers)Debra L. Mills (7 shared papers)Ursula Bellugi (7 shared papers)Patrícia Belchior (5 shared papers)Allan L. Reiss (4 shared papers)Shannon Sisco (2 shared papers)William C. Mann (2 shared papers)Daphné Bavelier (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Games for Health Journal (3 papers)Neuropsychologia (3 papers)Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Anna Yam
15 papers receiving 506 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Developmental Neuroscience 203
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 55
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
- Cognitive Neuroscience 137
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Yam
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Yam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Yam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Yam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Yam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Yam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Yam. The network helps show where Anna Yam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Yam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 107 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 4 |
About Anna Yam
Anna Yam is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Demography, having authored 15 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Williams Syndrome Research (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers), Flow Experience in Various Fields (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (203 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations). Anna Yam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Marsiske, Debra L. Mills, Ursula Bellugi, Patrícia Belchior, Allan L. Reiss, Shannon Sisco, William C. Mann, Daphné Bavelier, Karlene Ball and Fumiko Hoeft. Their work appears in journals such as Games for Health Journal, Neuropsychologia, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Journal of Neuroscience and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.