Anna Yam
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Williams Syndrome Research
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
Papers in
-
- Williams Syndrome Research 7
-
- Flow Experience in Various Fields 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Marsiske (7 shared papers)Debra L. Mills (7 shared papers)Ursula Bellugi (7 shared papers)Patrícia Belchior (5 shared papers)Allan L. Reiss (4 shared papers)Shannon Sisco (2 shared papers)William C. Mann (2 shared papers)Karlene Ball (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Games for Health Journal (3 papers)Neuropsychologia (3 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)Neuropsychology (1 paper)Developmental Neuropsychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Anna Yam
15 papers receiving 547 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Developmental Neuroscience 216
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 120
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Yam
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Yam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Yam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Yam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Yam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Yam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Yam. The network helps show where Anna Yam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Yam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 4 |
About Anna Yam
Anna Yam is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Williams Syndrome Research (7 papers), Flow Experience in Various Fields (2 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (216 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (120 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations). Anna Yam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Marsiske, Debra L. Mills, Ursula Bellugi, Patrícia Belchior, Allan L. Reiss, Shannon Sisco, William C. Mann, Karlene Ball, Daphné Bavelier and Fumiko Hoeft. Their work appears in journals such as Games for Health Journal, Neuropsychologia, Computers in Human Behavior, Neuropsychology and Developmental Neuropsychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.