Frederick W. Marks

451 citations
25 papers · 100 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. Marks

22 papers receiving 70 citations

Peers

Frederick W. Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Political Science and International Relations 64
  • Development 7
  • History 15
  • Sociology and Political Science 49
  • Marketing 9
Replace Richard W. Van Alstyne with:
Richard W. Van Alstyne United States
Dorothy V. Jones United States
Charles E. Neu United States
Manfred Jonas United States
Jack R. Dukes United States
Julius W. Pratt United States
Wayne S. Cole United States
Michael G. Baylor United States
Soledad Loaeza Mexico
Edmund Ions United Kingdom
Frederick W. Marks relative to Richard W. Van Alstyne United States Richard W. Van Alstyne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Richard W. Van Alstyne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Marks. The network helps show where Frederick W. Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. Marks Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197514
2 198714
3 19808
4 19898
5 19856
6 19745
7 19905
8 20005
9 19864
10 19714
11 19874
12 19893
13 19873
14 19902
15 19782
16 19902
17 19972
18 19742
19
La CIA y Castillo Armas en Guatemala, 1954: nuevos indicios para una antigua interrogante
19961
20 19811

About Frederick W. Marks

Frederick W. Marks is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Cultural Studies and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 100 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers) and Cuban History and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (64 citations), Development (7 citations), History (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (49 citations) and Marketing (9 citations). Frederick W. Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerald A. Combs, Louis A. Pérez, Paul A. Varg, Stephen G. Rabe, Robert L. Beisner, Richard H. Immerman, Charles E. Neu, Lloyd C. Gardner, Douglas Brinkley and Stephen E. Ambrose. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, Diplomatic History, Pacific Historical Review and The William and Mary Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact