Charles E. Neu

469 citations
30 papers · 163 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Charles E. Neu

19 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Charles E. Neu
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
  • Cultural Studies 24
  • Development 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 83
  • History 20
Replace Frederick W. Marks with:
Frederick W. Marks United States
Roger Dingman United States
Wayne S. Cole United States
Jules Robert Benjamin United States
Frederick R. Dickinson United States
Erik Goldstein United Kingdom
Gordon Martel Canada
Philip E. Mosely United States
Manfred Jonas United States
Saki Ruth Dockrill United Kingdom
Charles E. Neu relative to Frederick W. Marks United States Frederick W. Marks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Frederick W. Marks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Neu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Neu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Neu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Neu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Neu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Neu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Neu. The network helps show where Charles E. Neu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Neu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Neu Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Neu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197067
2 196720
3 200011
4 199510
5 19768
6 20025
7 19725
8 19715
9 20033
10 19923
11 19803
12 19733
13 19763
14 19882
15 19852
16 19962
17 19682
18 19791
19 20011
20 19811

About Charles E. Neu

Charles E. Neu is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian American and Pacific Histories (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (6 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), Cultural Studies (24 citations), Development (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (83 citations) and History (20 citations). Charles E. Neu has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dean Acheson, David I. Kaiser, John Prados, Robert D. Schulzinger, Akira Iriye, Marilyn Blatt Young, Warren I. Cohen, John Milton Cooper Jr., Masao Miyoshi and Edward L. Schapsmeier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Military History, The Journal of Southern History and Pacific Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact