Charles E. Neu

468 citations
27 papers · 120 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Charles E. Neu

20 papers receiving 74 citations

Peers

Charles E. Neu
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 62
  • Cultural Studies 14
  • Development 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 59
  • History 12
Replace Frederick W. Marks with:
Frederick W. Marks United States
Wayne S. Cole United States
Kenton Clymer United States
Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin
Manfred Jonas United States
Julius W. Pratt United States
Peter Calvocoressi United Kingdom
C. A. Macartney United Kingdom
Phillip S. Paludan United States
Erik Goldstein United States
Charles E. Neu relative to Frederick W. Marks United States Frederick W. Marks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Frederick W. Marks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Neu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Neu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Neu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Neu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Neu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Neu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Neu. The network helps show where Charles E. Neu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Neu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Neu Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Neu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197048
2 200010
3 199510
4 19767
5 19675
6 19725
7 20024
8 19923
9 19713
10 19733
11 19763
12 19852
13 19682
14 19962
15 19802
16 19891
17 19811
18 19661
19 19991
20 19731

About Charles E. Neu

Charles E. Neu is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 27 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian American and Pacific Histories (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (5 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (62 citations), Cultural Studies (14 citations), Development (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (59 citations) and History (12 citations). Charles E. Neu has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dean Acheson, David Kaiser, John Prados, Robert D. Schulzinger, Warren I. Cohen, Akira Iriye, Marilyn B. Young, John M. Cooper, Masao Miyoshi and Robert Seager. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Military History, The Journal of Southern History and Pacific Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact