Frederick W. King

2.0k citations
71 papers · 1.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. King

71 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Frederick W. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.0k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 274
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 149
  • Applied Mathematics 163
  • Biophysics 78
Replace Jun John Sakurai with:
Jun John Sakurai Japan
Shigeji Fujita United States
Tohru Morita Japan
Everett Thiele United States
E. M. Lifshit︠s︡ Belarus
P. Résibois Belgium
F. Lado United States
D. W. Noid United States
Alberto Parola Italy
Petros N. Argyres United States
Frederick W. King relative to Jun John Sakurai Japan Jun John Sakurai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jun John Sakurai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. King. The network helps show where Frederick W. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. King Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978258
2 1989116
3 200972
4 197653
5 199749
6 198848
7 199043
8 198642
9 199537
10 200237
11 200935
12 199330
13 199730
14 199130
15 197629
16 198929
17 197929
18 199428
19 199128
20 201126

About Frederick W. King

Frederick W. King is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Applied Mathematics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Mathematical Physics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (37 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (37 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (16 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (12 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (4 papers) and Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (274 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (149 citations), Applied Mathematics (163 citations) and Biophysics (78 citations). Frederick W. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include George C. Schatz, Richard P. Van Duyne, Victor Shoup, Michael K. Kelly, I. Porras, D. Feldmann, Kenneth J. Dykema, John Langer, Stuart M. Rothstein and Scott A. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review A, Molecular Physics, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact