Frederick S. Stover

791 citations
33 papers · 673 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick S. Stover

33 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Frederick S. Stover
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Bioengineering 184
  • Electrochemistry 153
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 122
  • Statistics and Probability 82
  • Filtration and Separation 16
Replace Pavan K. Shukla with:
Pavan K. Shukla United States
Paolo Conti Italy
Han Gao China
Dom A. J. Swinkels Australia
George. Lauer United States
Mingyan Wang China
Glimaldo Marino Brazil
Jen Chiu United States
Helena M.N.T. Avelino Portugal
Jinjing Zhang China
Frederick S. Stover relative to Pavan K. Shukla United States Pavan K. Shukla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Pavan K. Shukla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick S. Stover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick S. Stover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick S. Stover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick S. Stover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick S. Stover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick S. Stover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick S. Stover. The network helps show where Frederick S. Stover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederick S. Stover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick S. Stover Line = papers co-authored together Frederick S. Stover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998134
2 198451
3 199547
4 198941
5 200134
6 199433
7 197830
8 197924
9 199323
10 199723
11 199923
12 197719
13 198019
14 197618
15 200217
16 198117
17 199016
18 197814
19 197813
20 197913

About Frederick S. Stover

Frederick S. Stover is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Bioengineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (12 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (9 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (7 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers) and Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (184 citations), Electrochemistry (153 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (122 citations), Statistics and Probability (82 citations) and Filtration and Separation (16 citations). Frederick S. Stover has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Buck, Robert V Brill, D. C. Silverman, Barry L. Haymore, Richard K. Brow, Ezzeldin Metwalli, Janice K. Gard, Timothy R. Brumleve, Walter Grote and Owen R. Melroy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Analytica Chimica Acta, CORROSION, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Journal of Membrane Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact