Frederick Pfister
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Neurology top 5%
- Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Papers in
-
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 6
- Renal and related cancers 2
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 9
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Co-authors
- Yuxi Feng (13 shared papers)Hans‐Peter Hammes (18 shared papers)Hans-Peter Hammes (1 shared paper)Michael Brownlee (1 shared paper)Franziska vom Hagen (8 shared papers)Sigrid Hoffmann (6 shared papers)Urban Deutsch (6 shared papers)Alexander Marx (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry (5 papers)Diabetes (3 papers)Diabetologia (2 papers)Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frederick Pfister
45 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Ophthalmology 445
- Neurology 173
- Neurology 295
- Clinical Biochemistry 129
- Nephrology 127
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Pfister
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Pfister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Pfister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Pfister more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Pfister
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Pfister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Pfister. The network helps show where Frederick Pfister may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Pfister, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 299 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 265 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 209 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 100 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 70 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 22 |
About Frederick Pfister
Frederick Pfister is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Nephrology, Physiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (6 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (6 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (5 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (445 citations), Neurology (173 citations), Neurology (295 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (129 citations) and Nephrology (127 citations). Frederick Pfister has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yuxi Feng, Hans‐Peter Hammes, Hans-Peter Hammes, Michael Brownlee, Franziska vom Hagen, Sigrid Hoffmann, Urban Deutsch, Alexander Marx, Philipp Ströbel and Arthur Melms. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, Diabetes, Diabetologia, Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Histopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.