Frederick Johnson

61 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Frederick Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 161
  • Developmental Biology 21
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Space and Planetary Science 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 130
Replace Rolf Peter Willig with:
Rolf Peter Willig Germany
M. S. Jacobs United States
Hideki Nakano Japan
Shozo Matano Japan
Edward S. Halas United States
David Megirian Australia
Nektaria Nicolakakis Canada
James A. Cooper United Kingdom
J. A. F. Stevenson Canada
Alan H. Harris United States
Frederick Johnson relative to Rolf Peter Willig Germany Rolf Peter Willig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Rolf Peter Willig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Johnson. The network helps show where Frederick Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200790
2 197970
3 196761
4 196743
5 197242
6 197236
7 197235
8 198426
9 196922
10 197622
11
Investigations in Southwest Yukon: Geobotanical and Archaeological Reconnaissance
196421
12 201218
13 198916
14 198316
15 195614
16
The influence of intensity of colour on perceived flavour characteristics.
198713
17 197912
18 197610
19 20059
20 19769

About Frederick Johnson

Frederick Johnson is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Anthropology, Paleontology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 71 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (161 citations), Developmental Biology (21 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Space and Planetary Science (10 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (130 citations). Frederick Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Turner Sharp, Robert Vink, Ibolja Černak, Norma Boone Goldberg, Hugh Miller Raup, A. Amdisen, Osceola Whitney, Giuseppe Nappi, Matthew T. Ross and Richard L. Hyson. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Science, American Antiquity, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact