Frederick Johnson

56 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers

Frederick Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 133
  • Developmental Biology 21
  • Space and Planetary Science 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 117
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
Replace G Pilleri with:
G Pilleri Switzerland
M. S. Jacobs United States
Thomas McLaughlin United States
Keith Sudheimer United States
Edward S. Halas United States
Michael Turton United Kingdom
Alan H. Harris United States
Mary Pickford United Kingdom
Nektaria Nicolakakis Canada
Charles Hamilton United States
Frederick Johnson relative to G Pilleri Switzerland G Pilleri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
G Pilleri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Johnson. The network helps show where Frederick Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200785
2 197960
3 196756
4 196741
5 197239
6 197236
7 197232
8 198423
9 197621
10
Investigations in Southwest Yukon: Geobotanical and Archaeological Reconnaissance
196421
11 196920
12 201219
13 198314
14 198914
15 195611
16 197911
17
The influence of intensity of colour on perceived flavour characteristics.
198710
18 195110
19 19769
20 19678

About Frederick Johnson

Frederick Johnson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Anthropology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (133 citations), Developmental Biology (21 citations), Space and Planetary Science (10 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (117 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations). Frederick Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include John T. Sharp, Robert Vink, Ibolja Černak, Norma Boone Goldberg, Hugh M. Raup, A. Amdisen, Giuseppe Nappi, Osceola Whitney, Froelich Rainey and M. T. Ross. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Antiquity, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact