Frederick E. Crowe
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Papers in
- History 9
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 5
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 2
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
- Journals
- Theological Studies (6 papers)The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review (1 paper)International Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (5 papers)University of Toronto Press eBooks (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick E. Crowe
15 papers receiving 106 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- History and Philosophy of Science 44
- Philosophy 102
- General Psychology 9
- Health 25
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Crowe. The network helps show where Frederick E. Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verbum: word and idea in Aquinas | 1967 | 98 |
| 2 | Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan | 1988 | 58 |
| 3 | Understanding and Being the Halifax Lectures on Insight | 1990 | 16 |
| 4 | 1959 | 7 | |
| 5 | The Lonergan enterprise | 1980 | 7 |
| 6 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 8 | A third collection : papers | 1985 | 4 |
| 9 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 11 | Christ and History: The Christology of Bernard Lonergan from 1935 to 1982 | 2015 | 2 |
| 12 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 1 |
About Frederick E. Crowe
Frederick E. Crowe is a scholar working on History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Education, having authored 32 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations), Philosophy (102 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Health (25 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Frederick E. Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Lonergan and Robert Doran. Their work appears in journals such as Theological Studies, The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, International Philosophical Quarterly, Medical Entomology and Zoology and University of Toronto Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.