Frederick E. Crowe
Impact in
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Philosophy top 5%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Papers in
- History 8
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 5
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 2
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 2
- Journals
- Theological Studies (5 papers)The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review (1 paper)International Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)University of Toronto Press eBooks (1 paper)Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick E. Crowe
14 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- General Psychology 9
- Philosophy 57
- Health 25
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- History 24
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Crowe. The network helps show where Frederick E. Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Frederick E. Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan | 1988 | 50 |
| 2 | Verbum: word and idea in Aquinas | 1967 | 50 |
| 3 | Understanding and Being the Halifax Lectures on Insight | 1990 | 15 |
| 4 | The Lonergan enterprise | 1980 | 7 |
| 5 | 1959 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 8 | A third collection : papers | 1985 | 3 |
| 9 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 1 |
About Frederick E. Crowe
Frederick E. Crowe is a scholar working on History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Education and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catholicism and Religious Studies (5 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Philosophy (57 citations), Health (25 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and History (24 citations). Frederick E. Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Lonergan and Robert Doran. Their work appears in journals such as Theological Studies, The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, International Philosophical Quarterly, University of Toronto Press eBooks and Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.