Frederick C. Strong

410 citations
22 papers · 290 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick C. Strong

19 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Frederick C. Strong
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biochemistry 31
  • Filtration and Separation 7
  • Electrochemistry 20
  • Analytical Chemistry 27
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 23
Replace J. Dick with:
J. Dick United Kingdom
John D. Naworal United States
W. J. Criddle United Kingdom
Hirokazu Morita Japan
Bengt Skrifvars Finland
Tai‐Sheng Yeh Taiwan
G. Blo Italy
Shoichi Okouchi Japan
A. G. Vitenberg Russia
Valnei S. Cunha Brazil
Frederick C. Strong relative to J. Dick United Kingdom J. Dick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
J. Dick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick C. Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick C. Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick C. Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick C. Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick C. Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick C. Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick C. Strong. The network helps show where Frederick C. Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Frederick C. Strong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick C. Strong Line = papers co-authored together Frederick C. Strong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195763
2 198258
3 195245
4 196138
5 198215
6 197915
7 198015
8 19698
9 19595
10 19765
11 19824
12 19854
13 19533
14 19803
15 19522
16
Determination of tocopherols (vitamin E) by reduction of cupric ion [Foods, feeds, chemical analysis, methods]
19822
17 19791
18 19571
19
A room-temperature, rapid method for the determination of protein in wheat and other grains by the biuret reaction.
19921
20 19821

About Frederick C. Strong

Frederick C. Strong is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Various Chemistry Research Topics (6 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (2 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers) and Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (31 citations), Filtration and Separation (7 citations), Electrochemistry (20 citations), Analytical Chemistry (27 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (23 citations). Frederick C. Strong has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include George L. Zimmerman. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Chemical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact