Frederick C. Eilber

18 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Frederick C. Eilber
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 388
  • Gastroenterology 37
  • Rheumatology 102
  • Oncology 181
  • Biotechnology 57
Replace Eva Koscielniak with:
Eva Koscielniak Germany
G Michils Belgium
Jianmin Song China
Andrea D. Chapman United Kingdom
Samantha Brownhill United Kingdom
Lorena Gurrieri Italy
Guanyu Yu China
Maria A. Zarzour United States
Esther Baranov United States
Sun-Hwi Hwang South Korea
Frederick C. Eilber relative to Eva Koscielniak Germany Eva Koscielniak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Eva Koscielniak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick C. Eilber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick C. Eilber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick C. Eilber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick C. Eilber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick C. Eilber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick C. Eilber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick C. Eilber. The network helps show where Frederick C. Eilber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick C. Eilber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick C. Eilber Line = papers co-authored together Frederick C. Eilber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994225
2 1993102
3 201862
4 199831
5 200519
6 201918
7 200718
8 201912
9 20189
10 20048
11 20176
12 20193
13
A Study of Intensive Chemotherapy in 14 Patients with Localized Disease
19933
14 20043
15 20132
16 20241
17 20071
18 20121
19 19781
20 20150

About Frederick C. Eilber

Frederick C. Eilber is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (6 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (5 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (4 papers), Soft tissue tumors and treatment (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (388 citations), Gastroenterology (37 citations), Rheumatology (102 citations), Oncology (181 citations) and Biotechnology (57 citations). Frederick C. Eilber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Charles Forscher, Jeffrey J. Eċkardt, Gerald Rosen, Susan Lowenbraun, Yao Fu, Michael T. Selch, Michael W. Kattan, Barry W. Goy, Yao‐Shi Fu and Steve P. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Cancer, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Anticancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact