Countries where authors publish in Anticancer Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anticancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anticancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anticancer Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Anticancer Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anticancer Research.
About Anticancer Research
The 6.6k papers published in Anticancer Research in the last decades have received a total of 69.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Anticancer Research usually cover Oncology (1.8k papers), Cancer Research (652 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (257 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k papers) and Hepatology (239 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (265 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (257 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (247 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (240 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (230 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (229 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (208 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anticancer Research are Robert M. Hoffman, Anca Maria Cîmpean, Pithi Chanvorachote B, ŞERBAN COMŞA, Henry C. Lai, Kari Juhani Syrjänen, Kefah Mokbel, Narendra Prasad Singh, Hyun Soo Kim and Angiolo Gadducci.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.