Frederick Bloom

72 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Frederick Bloom
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Mathematics 285
  • Modeling and Simulation 85
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 315
  • Control and Systems Engineering 357
  • Numerical Analysis 78
Replace Franck Boyer with:
Franck Boyer France
C. Verdi Italy
Dongming Wei United States
B. Mena Mexico
Milan Miklavčič United States
Mohamed Abdelwahed Saudi Arabia
D. R. Bland United Kingdom
Debra A. Polignone United States
Michele Ciarletta Italy
Alexei Lozinski France
Frederick Bloom relative to Franck Boyer France Franck Boyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Franck Boyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Bloom. The network helps show where Frederick Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Bloom Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Bloom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000133
2 1994118
3 198065
4 199958
5 200057
6 198156
7 200256
8 199255
9 200250
10 200145
11 200144
12 195532
13 199532
14 199730
15 196928
16 197923
17 199919
18 199515
19 199514
20 200513

About Frederick Bloom

Frederick Bloom is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (25 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (23 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (9 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (9 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (9 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (8 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (8 papers) and Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (285 citations), Modeling and Simulation (85 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (315 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (357 citations) and Numerical Analysis (78 citations). Frederick Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Coffin, Hamid Bellout, Theodore J. Heindel, Jindřich Nečas, Timothy Patterson, Edward B. Brown, Xiaodong Wang and J. Nečas. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinear Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact