Frederick Bloom

1.4k citations
72 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick Bloom

67 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Frederick Bloom
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Applied Mathematics 468
  • Numerical Analysis 51
  • Water Science and Technology 172
  • Control and Systems Engineering 232
  • Mechanics of Materials 194
Replace Alison P. Hooper with:
Alison P. Hooper United Kingdom
M. A. Ilgamov Russia
M. Tahir Mustafa Qatar
Jan Adam Kołodziej Poland
Gerhard Starke Germany
É. Sanchez-Palencia France
Richard S. Schechter United States
Бадриев Ильдар Бурханович Russia
W. R. Hodgkins United Kingdom
David E. Glass United States
Frederick Bloom relative to Alison P. Hooper United Kingdom Alison P. Hooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.6×
Alison P. Hooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Bloom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Bloom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Bloom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Bloom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Bloom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Bloom. The network helps show where Frederick Bloom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Bloom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Bloom Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Bloom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000132
2 1994122
3 198064
4 199258
5 198157
6 199957
7 200057
8 200256
9 200252
10 200145
11 200144
12 199533
13 199730
14 197922
15 199918
16 199516
17 201316
18 199514
19 200513
20 200812

About Frederick Bloom

Frederick Bloom is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Water Science and Technology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (20 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (15 papers), Navier-Stokes equation solutions (15 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (10 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (8 papers), Elasticity and Wave Propagation (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (7 papers) and Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (468 citations), Numerical Analysis (51 citations), Water Science and Technology (172 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (232 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (194 citations). Frederick Bloom has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Coffin, Hamid Bellout, Theodore J. Heindel, Jindřich Nečas, Timothy F. Patterson and J. Nečas. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinear Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact