Frédéric Isel

891 citations
42 papers · 526 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Frédéric Isel

35 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

Frédéric Isel
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 417
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 270
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
  • Language and Linguistics 66
  • Linguistics and Language 28
Replace Daniel Kleinman with:
Daniel Kleinman United States
Gabriel Gutiérrez United States
Hintat Cheung Taiwan
Kristen M. Tooley United States
Alejandra Marful Spain
David S. Race United States
Luca Campanelli United States
Aya Meltzer‐Asscher Israel
Sara Andreetta Italy
Inger Moen Norway
Frédéric Isel relative to Daniel Kleinman United States Daniel Kleinman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Kleinman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Isel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Isel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Isel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Isel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Isel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Isel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Isel. The network helps show where Frédéric Isel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Isel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Isel Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Isel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202081
2 200664
3 201349
4 200946
5 200843
6 200341
7 200527
8 201720
9 201620
10 199919
11 200716
12 202015
13 201712
14 20218
15 20138
16 20168
17 20178
18 20206
19 20005
20 20214

About Frédéric Isel

Frédéric Isel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 42 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (7 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (417 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (270 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations), Language and Linguistics (66 citations) and Linguistics and Language (28 citations). Frédéric Isel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Karin Doré-Mazars Heidlmayr, Angela Dorkas Friederici, Jürgen M. Meisel, Anja Hahne, Burkhard Maeß, Thomas C. Gunter, Christian Büchel, Kai Alter, Annette Baumgaertner and Sylvain Moutier. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Cognition, Journal of Neurolinguistics, Neuroreport, Neuropsychologia and Bilingualism Language and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact