Frédéric Hague

27 papers receiving 981 citations

Peers

Frédéric Hague
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Sensory Systems 387
  • Toxicology 56
  • Biochemistry 95
  • Physiology 58
  • Molecular Biology 577
Replace Maxime Guéguinou with:
Maxime Guéguinou France
D. McAndrew Australia
Iwona Hirschler‐Laszkiewicz United States
Michaël Monet France
Karine Vanoverberghe France
Hannah J. Gaunt United Kingdom
Yassine El Hiani Canada
Maylis Raphaël France
David Crottès France
Véronique Juvin United Kingdom
Frédéric Hague relative to Maxime Guéguinou France Maxime Guéguinou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maxime Guéguinou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Hague

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Hague's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Hague with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Hague more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Hague

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Hague. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Hague. The network helps show where Frédéric Hague may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Hague, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Hague Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Hague links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010173
2 2012127
3 201294
4 201888
5 200761
6 201660
7 201958
8 201747
9 201740
10 200535
11 201930
12 201128
13 200123
14 201521
15 201519
16 202117
17 202014
18 200012
19 202211
20 202210

About Frédéric Hague

Frédéric Hague is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biochemistry, Toxicology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion Channels and Receptors (15 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (10 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (5 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (5 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (387 citations), Toxicology (56 citations), Biochemistry (95 citations), Physiology (58 citations) and Molecular Biology (577 citations). Frédéric Hague has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and United States. Frequent co-authors include Halima Ouadid‐Ahidouch, Ahmed Ahidouch, Henri Sevestre, Malika Faouzi, Marie‐Claude Potier, Philippe Kischel, Lise Rodat‐Despoix, Dirk Geerts, Isabelle Dhennin‐Duthille and Mathieu Gautier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cellular Physiology, Cancers, FEBS Letters, Cellular Signalling and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact