Frédéric Dô

35 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Frédéric Dô
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Global and Planetary Change 555
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 225
  • Forestry 66
  • Horticulture 16
  • Atmospheric Science 247
Replace C. Leuschner with:
C. Leuschner Germany
André Granier France
Tarryn L. Turnbull Australia
Clarissa G. Fontes United States
A. A. H. Khan Kenya
D. Stuart Crombie Australia
Halidou Compaoré Burkina Faso
Supat Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya Thailand
Furong Niu China
Paula Jackson United States
Frédéric Dô relative to C. Leuschner Germany C. Leuschner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
C. Leuschner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Dô

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Dô's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Dô with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Dô more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Dô

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Dô. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Dô. The network helps show where Frédéric Dô may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Dô, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Dô Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Dô links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021135
2 2002110
3 200290
4 200582
5 200948
6 199134
7 201830
8 201224
9 201324
10
Caractères morphologiques et physiologiques de résistance du mil (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) à la sécheresse
199219
11 201517
12 199617
13 202116
14 199115
15 201615
16 202211
17 202211
18 201810
19 20209
20 20196

About Frédéric Dô

Frédéric Dô is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry, Soil Science and Atmospheric Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (22 papers), Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (5 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (4 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (555 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (225 citations), Forestry (66 citations), Horticulture (16 citations) and Atmospheric Science (247 citations). Frédéric Dô has collaborated with scholars based in France, Senegal and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Alain Rocheteau, Supat Isarangkool Na Ayutthaya, Thierry Winkel, Venceslas Goudiaby, Olivier Giménez, Josiane Seghieri, Hervé Cochard, Jean‐Luc Maeght, Jean‐Louis Devineau and Anne Fournier. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Earth system science data, Agroforestry Systems and Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact