Fred R. Johnson

494 citations
20 papers · 356 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Fred R. Johnson

13 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Fred R. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Philosophy 69
  • Literature and Literary Theory 53
  • Language and Linguistics 46
  • Public Administration 11
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 35
Replace Malcolm O. Sillars with:
Malcolm O. Sillars United States
Lee O. Thayer United States
David Godden United States
Frederick L. Will United States
Jim Mackenzie Australia
Robert C. Pinto Canada
Jane A. Nicholson United Kingdom
M. Mark Miller United States
Chantal Benoit‐Barné Canada
Jaime Nubiola Spain
Fred R. Johnson relative to Malcolm O. Sillars United States Malcolm O. Sillars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Malcolm O. Sillars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred R. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred R. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred R. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred R. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred R. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred R. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred R. Johnson. The network helps show where Fred R. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Fred R. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred R. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Fred R. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1980280
2 198924
3 200412
4 19918
5 19896
6
A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic
19766
7 19953
8 19783
9 19993
10 19942
11 19972
12 20052
13 19932
14 19842
15 19991
16 20120
17 19780
18
Recruiting, Retaining and Advancing Minority Employees.
19720
19 19760
20 20250

About Fred R. Johnson

Fred R. Johnson is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 20 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (1 paper) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (69 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (53 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (35 citations). Fred R. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald S. Hanna, Patrick M. Wright, Alan P. Koretsky and Laxmi Ravi Iyer. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Informal Logic, History and Philosophy of Logic and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact