Fred Nath
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
-
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Sam Galbraith (1 shared paper)Nitin Mukerji (4 shared papers)G. M. Teasdale (1 shared paper)Stefanie Baisch (2 shared papers)Thomas Schenk (2 shared papers)Adam Noble (2 shared papers)A. David Mendelow (3 shared papers)P. Macpherson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (3 papers)Acta Neurochirurgica (2 papers)Injury (2 papers)World Neurosurgery (1 paper)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Fred Nath
20 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Neurology 209
- Emergency Medicine 45
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
- Developmental Neuroscience 11
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 43
Countries citing papers authored by Fred Nath
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Nath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Nath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Nath. The network helps show where Fred Nath may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Nath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 1 |
About Fred Nath
Fred Nath is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (3 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (3 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (209 citations), Emergency Medicine (45 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (43 citations). Fred Nath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sam Galbraith, Nitin Mukerji, G. M. Teasdale, Stefanie Baisch, Thomas Schenk, Adam Noble, A. David Mendelow, P. Macpherson, D Gentleman and L M Flood. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, Injury, World Neurosurgery and The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.