Fred de Winter

3.8k citations
54 papers · 3.0k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Fred de Winter

51 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Fred de Winter
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Developmental Neuroscience 756
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Cell Biology 485
  • Genetics 263
  • Neurology 340
Replace Andrey Irintchev with:
Andrey Irintchev Germany
Victor F. Rafuse Canada
Fatiha Nothias France
Feng‐Quan Zhou United States
Cynthia R. Keller-Peck United States
Von R. King United Kingdom
Steven Einheber United States
Richard R. Ribchester United Kingdom
Silvia De Biasi Italy
Igor Jakovčevski Germany
Fred de Winter relative to Andrey Irintchev Germany Andrey Irintchev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Andrey Irintchev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred de Winter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred de Winter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred de Winter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred de Winter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred de Winter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred de Winter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred de Winter. The network helps show where Fred de Winter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred de Winter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred de Winter Line = papers co-authored together Fred de Winter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999275
2 2014238
3 2002237
4 1998165
5 2006145
6 2005123
7 2013112
8 2020103
9 202186
10 201485
11 201883
12 202081
13 201377
14 199674
15 201972
16 202171
17 202270
18 202268
19 200460
20 201659

About Fred de Winter

Fred de Winter is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 54 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (30 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (17 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (11 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (8 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (756 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Cell Biology (485 citations), Genetics (263 citations) and Neurology (340 citations). Fred de Winter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joost Verhaagen, R. Jeroen Pasterkamp, Anthony Holtmaat, Elizabeth B. Moloney, Joris de Wit, Marc J. Ruitenberg, Martijn J. A. Malessy, Martijn R. Tannemaat, Daniela Carulli and Roman J. Giger. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Brain, PLoS ONE and Gene Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact