Fred Beauvais

5.0k citations
75 papers · 4.0k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Beauvais

73 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Fred Beauvais
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 1.2k
  • Applied Psychology 227
  • Epidemiology 1.4k
  • Health 338
Replace David W. Brook with:
David W. Brook United States
Martin Whiteman United States
Elizabeth A. Wells United States
Tracy Diaz United States
Frances M. Costa United States
Cleve Redmond United States
Karol L. Kumpfer United States
Christopher L. Ringwalt United States
Christina M. Mitchell United States
Alex Copello United Kingdom
Fred Beauvais relative to David W. Brook United States David W. Brook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
David W. Brook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Beauvais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Beauvais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Beauvais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Beauvais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Beauvais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Beauvais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Beauvais. The network helps show where Fred Beauvais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Beauvais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Beauvais Line = papers co-authored together Fred Beauvais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991459
2 1990347
3 1987296
4 1990284
5 1986226
6 1995168
7
American Indians and alcohol.
1998161
8 1989144
9 1989114
10 1997112
11 1987107
12 201492
13 199889
14 198581
15 198973
16 198861
17 199961
18 200460
19 198560
20 201159

About Fred Beauvais

Fred Beauvais is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Education, having authored 75 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (28 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (13 papers), Community Health and Development (12 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers) and Statistical Methods and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (227 citations), Epidemiology (1.4k citations) and Health (338 citations). Fred Beauvais has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include E. R. Oetting, Randall C. Swaim, Ruth Edwards, Barbara Plested, Joseph F. Donnermeyer, Pamela Jumper‐Thurman, Richard Edwards, Ruth W. Edwards, Linda R. Stanley and Joseph E. Trimble. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, Journal of Counseling Psychology and Journal of Counseling & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact