Fraser Welsh

12 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

Fraser Welsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 88
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 15
  • Molecular Biology 104
  • Inorganic Chemistry 19
  • Biological Psychiatry 3
Replace N. C. Panagiotopoulos with:
N. C. Panagiotopoulos United States
Harunobu Mukaiyama Japan
Benjamin Moore United States
Glen L. Tolman United States
Heiko Bönisch Germany
Jennifer M. Nguyen United States
Xiao Ling Huang China
Dean A. Wacker United States
Christopher J. MacNevin United States
Fraser Welsh relative to N. C. Panagiotopoulos United States N. C. Panagiotopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
N. C. Panagiotopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Welsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Welsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Welsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Welsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Welsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Welsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Welsh. The network helps show where Fraser Welsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Welsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Welsh Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Welsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2008101
2 196136
3 200229
4 196218
5 198411
6 201710
7 19666
8 20213
9 20243
10 19662
11 20242
12 20251
13 20250

About Fraser Welsh

Fraser Welsh is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Organic Chemistry, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 222 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper), Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (88 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (15 citations), Molecular Biology (104 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (19 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (3 citations). Fraser Welsh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ellis R. Lippincott, Tristan J. Vaughan, Colin Hardman, David C. Lowe, Christopher Lloyd, Bryan Edwards, F. Scott Mathews, Stephen K. Chapman, L. M. Cunane and Gillian Reid. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Protein Engineering Design and Selection, Journal of Neurochemistry and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact