Fraser Mitchell

5.1k citations
99 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Fraser Mitchell

96 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Fraser Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 673
  • Atmospheric Science 717
  • Insect Science 482
  • Paleontology 241
  • Global and Planetary Change 572
Replace Greger Hörnberg with:
Greger Hörnberg Sweden
Kenneth P. Lertzman Canada
Małgorzata Latałowa Poland
Péter Szabó Czechia
Lars Östlund Sweden
Ioan Tanţău Romania
T. van der Hammen Netherlands
Petr Kuneš Czechia
Ken Lertzman Canada
F. W. M. Vera Netherlands
Fraser Mitchell relative to Greger Hörnberg Sweden Greger Hörnberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Greger Hörnberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Mitchell. The network helps show where Fraser Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fraser Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fraser Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Fraser Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004211
2 1990115
3 2006105
4 198891
5 200681
6 200780
7 199968
8 199668
9 201265
10 200859
11 199858
12 200654
13 199050
14 201448
15 201340
16 201740
17 199435
18 200734
19 199533
20 201233

About Fraser Mitchell

Fraser Mitchell is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (36 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (14 papers), Forest Management and Policy (13 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (12 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (10 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (673 citations), Atmospheric Science (717 citations), Insect Science (482 citations), Paleontology (241 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (572 citations). Fraser Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. J. Kirby, Daniel L. Kelly, Alison J. Hester, Richard Bradshaw, Susan Iremonger, George F. Smith, Donna Hawthorne, Daniel L. Kelly, John O’Halloran and Michael Salter‐Townshend. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, The Holocene, Biodiversity and Conservation, Journal of Ecology and Quaternary International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact