Frank Jäger

439 citations
14 papers · 347 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frank Jäger

13 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Frank Jäger
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 251
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 29
  • Biophysics 25
  • Molecular Biology 217
  • Spectroscopy 32
Replace Mutsumi Maruyama with:
Mutsumi Maruyama Japan
Catalina A. Rotunno Argentina
Adam M. Knepp United States
Céline Boiteux Australia
Nathan S. Babcock United States
T. B. Feldman Russia
E. Frehland Germany
Richard A. Levis United States
Qufei Li United States
John Maguire United Kingdom
Frank Jäger relative to Mutsumi Maruyama Japan Mutsumi Maruyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Mutsumi Maruyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Jäger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Jäger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Jäger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Jäger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Jäger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Jäger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Jäger. The network helps show where Frank Jäger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank Jäger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frank Jäger Line = papers co-authored together Frank Jäger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1993212
2 200830
3 199729
4 199714
5 199811
6 199811
7 200511
8 199610
9 19968
10 20234
11 20233
12 19993
13 20181
14 20160

About Frank Jäger

Frank Jäger is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biophysics, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computational Mechanics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (1 paper), Combustion and flame dynamics (1 paper) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (251 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (29 citations), Biophysics (25 citations), Molecular Biology (217 citations) and Spectroscopy (32 citations). Frank Jäger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tatyana Zvyaga, Friedrich Siebert, Karim Fahmy, Thomas P. Sakmar, G. H. Atkinson, Laszlo Ujj, Robert Schießl, Mustapha Fikri, Alexander Schubert and Erik Kerstel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biophysical Journal, Chemical Physics, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact