Frank Fleischer

1.2k citations
50 papers · 966 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Frank Fleischer

49 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

Frank Fleischer
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Applied Mathematics 134
  • Neurology 69
  • Cell Biology 128
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 29
  • Oncology 174
Replace Michael D. Wong with:
Michael D. Wong Canada
Jaroslav Novák Czechia
José C. M. Mombach Brazil
Andrea Hawkins‐Daarud United States
Leili Shahriyari United States
Ingmar Glauche Germany
Zhiqi Chen China
Albert Murtha Canada
Avner Friedman United States
Miguel O. Bernabéu United Kingdom
Frank Fleischer relative to Michael D. Wong Canada Michael D. Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Michael D. Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Fleischer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Fleischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Fleischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Fleischer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Fleischer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Fleischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Fleischer. The network helps show where Frank Fleischer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank Fleischer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frank Fleischer Line = papers co-authored together Frank Fleischer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200782
2 201273
3 201271
4 200869
5 200954
6 200641
7 200638
8 201338
9 200535
10 200135
11 200031
12 200930
13 200727
14 201226
15 200923
16 200519
17 201018
18 200517
19 200716
20 200916

About Frank Fleischer

Frank Fleischer is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Cell Biology, Geometry and Topology, Statistics and Probability and Oncology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Point processes and geometric inequalities (15 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (7 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (4 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers) and Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (134 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Cell Biology (128 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (29 citations) and Oncology (174 citations). Frank Fleischer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Volker Schmidt, Catherine Gloaguen, Torsten Mattfeldt, Hendrik Schmidt, Erich Bluhmki, Birgit Gaschler‐Markefski, Michael Beil, Shozo Jinno, Toshio Kosaka and Werner Lehnert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Microscopy, Blood, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact