Frances Hellman
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Theoretical and Computational Physics 45
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 39
-
- Magnetic properties of thin films 87
- Co-authors
- Barry L. Zink (21 shared papers)E. M. Gyorgy (14 shared papers)D. Kim (4 shared papers)B. Revaz (6 shared papers)Daniel Queen (15 shared papers)E.N. Abarra (8 shared papers)Catherine Bordel (19 shared papers)P. W. Rooney (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Physics Letters (25 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (22 papers)Physical Review Letters (22 papers)Physical Review B (22 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceAustralia
In The Last Decade
Frances Hellman
253 papers receiving 15.1k citations
Frances Hellman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 9.1k
- Condensed Matter Physics 2.4k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.4k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.4k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Frances Hellman
This map shows the geographic impact of Frances Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances Hellman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frances Hellman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances Hellman. The network helps show where Frances Hellman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frances Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 265 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M ⊙ Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1268 |
| 2 | GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 1246 |
| 3 | GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ⊙ Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1022 |
| 4 | Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 730 |
| 5 | Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 729 |
| 6 | Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 727 |
| 7 | Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 538 |
| 8 | GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 508 |
| 9 | GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 383 |
| 10 | GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 370 |
| 11 | Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 339 |
| 12 | 2019 | 308 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 294 | |
| 14 | Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 243 |
| 15 | 1994 | 221 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 197 | |
| 17 | Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 194 |
| 18 | 2020 | 156 | |
| 19 | Creation and observation of Hopfions in magnetic multilayer systems | 2021 | 152 |
| 20 | 2002 | 150 |
About Frances Hellman
Frances Hellman is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry, having authored 265 papers that have together received 15.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (87 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (70 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (45 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (39 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (39 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (34 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (27 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (9.1k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (2.4k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.4k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.5k citations). Frances Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Barry L. Zink, E. M. Gyorgy, D. Kim, B. Revaz, Daniel Queen, E.N. Abarra, Catherine Bordel, P. W. Rooney, J. J. Rhyne and David W. Cooke. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.