Forrest Smith
Impact in
- Toxicology top 1%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Papers in
- Pharmacology 15
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 10
- Co-authors
- Toshimitsu Hayashi (1 shared paper)Jack DeRuiter (16 shared papers)Kuo Hsiung Lee (1 shared paper)Charles R. Clark (15 shared papers)Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran (8 shared papers)Sindhu Ramesh (6 shared papers)Manoj Govindarajulu (6 shared papers)Timothy Moore (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Chemistry (3 papers)Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (2 papers)Talanta (2 papers)Journal of Chromatographic Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptLibya
In The Last Decade
Forrest Smith
45 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Toxicology 180
- Pharmacology 131
- Pharmaceutical Science 42
- Organic Chemistry 144
- Biotechnology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Forrest Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest Smith. The network helps show where Forrest Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Forrest Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 12 |
About Forrest Smith
Forrest Smith is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Toxicology, Organic Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (12 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (4 papers) and Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (180 citations), Pharmacology (131 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (42 citations), Organic Chemistry (144 citations) and Biotechnology (41 citations). Forrest Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Libya. Frequent co-authors include Toshimitsu Hayashi, Jack DeRuiter, Kuo Hsiung Lee, Charles R. Clark, Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran, Sindhu Ramesh, Manoj Govindarajulu, Timothy Moore, Jiansheng Huang and Peter Panizzi. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Talanta and Journal of Chromatographic Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.