Fletcher Fields

418 citations
7 papers · 331 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Fletcher Fields

7 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Fletcher Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Water Science and Technology 148
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 64
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 22
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 40
  • Pollution 51
Replace Maha N. Haji with:
Maha N. Haji United States
Jakub Szczurowski Poland
Hourui Ren China
Ingrīda Brēmere Netherlands
Jan-Peter Säck Germany
Enas Ali Saudi Arabia
Donald E. Garrett United States
Adam McHugh Australia
Lawrence Belo Philippines
Rebecca Peer New Zealand
Fletcher Fields relative to Maha N. Haji United States Maha N. Haji's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Maha N. Haji · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fletcher Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fletcher Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fletcher Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fletcher Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fletcher Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fletcher Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fletcher Fields. The network helps show where Fletcher Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Fletcher Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fletcher Fields Line = papers co-authored together Fletcher Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Water-Energy Nexus: Challenges and Opportunities
2014161
2 2016118
3 201526
4 201916
5 20177
6 20202
7
Does Religion Play a Part in U.S. Environmental Policymaking? The Effect of Religiously Motivated Campaign Contributions on Congressional Environmental Voting Patterns
20121

About Fletcher Fields

Fletcher Fields is a scholar working on Pollution, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 7 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (2 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (2 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (1 paper), Water resources management and optimization (1 paper), Energy and Environment Impacts (1 paper), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (1 paper) and Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (148 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (64 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (22 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (40 citations) and Pollution (51 citations). Fletcher Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Diana Bauer, Hoyt Battey, Jennifer Li, Roderick G. Eggert, Lawrence D. Meinert, Cyrus Wadia, Corby Anderson, Patrick R. Taylor, Matthew Riddle and Charles M. Macal. Their work appears in journals such as Resources Policy, Environmental Science & Technology, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, DukeSpace (Duke University) and DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact