Fiona Wright

470 citations
13 papers · 346 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Wright

13 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Fiona Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Clinical Psychology 214
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 50
  • Pharmacy 11
Replace Tammy L. Root with:
Tammy L. Root United States
Hiroko Mizushima Japan
Jacqueline Carter Canada
Peter R. Joyce New Zealand
Manfred M. Fichter Germany
Christopher Gordon United States
Jodie Richardson Canada
Kirsti Akkermann Estonia
Royce J. Lee United States
Danyale McCurdy United States
Fiona Wright relative to Tammy L. Root United States Tammy L. Root's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Tammy L. Root · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Wright. The network helps show where Fiona Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Wright Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2003111
2 200537
3 200336
4 200933
5 201326
6 201321
7 200321
8 201316
9 201215
10 198511
11 20108
12 19956
13 20145

About Fiona Wright

Fiona Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (1 paper) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (214 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations) and Pharmacy (11 citations). Fiona Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Indonesia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Glenn Waller, Caroline Meyer, R.J. Rodgers, Hendrik Hinrichsen, Bridgette M. Bewick, Allan House, Michael Barkham, Andrew J. Hill, Bryan Lask and Kate Willoughby. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Physiology & Behavior and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact