Fiona Randall

28 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

Fiona Randall
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 348
  • Family Practice 40
  • Clinical Psychology 281
  • Philosophy 129
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 290
Replace Robert Chaplin with:
Robert Chaplin United Kingdom
Theresa J. Hoeft United States
Bertram E. Stöffelmayr United States
Janet Landeen Canada
Carol A. Boyer United States
Jeanette Hewitt United Kingdom
Abigail Easter United Kingdom
Geetha Desai India
Christian Scheffer Germany
Marion Becker United States
Fiona Randall relative to Robert Chaplin United Kingdom Robert Chaplin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Robert Chaplin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Randall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Randall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Randall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Randall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Randall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Randall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Randall. The network helps show where Fiona Randall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Randall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Randall Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Randall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005278
2 1998108
3 200684
4 200366
5 200659
6 199956
7 199649
8 200044
9 200335
10
Clinical Judgement : Evidence in Practice
200032
11 199731
12
Palliative Care Ethics a Companion for All Specialties
199926
13 200418
14 200312
15 201012
16 200911
17 200510
18 20088
19 19938
20 19997

About Fiona Randall

Fiona Randall is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (14 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (348 citations), Family Practice (40 citations), Clinical Psychology (281 citations), Philosophy (129 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (290 citations). Fiona Randall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include R. S. Downie, Richard P. Bentall, David Healy, Jennifer Cheeseman Day, Anne Rogers, Chris Roberts, Dinah Cattell, Jane Macnaughton, J.P. Day and Rhiannon Corcoran. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Medicine, Palliative Medicine, Social Science & Medicine, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact