Fiona Jack

977 citations
22 papers · 674 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Jack

21 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Fiona Jack
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 405
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 26
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 295
  • Social Psychology 181
  • Clinical Psychology 145
Replace Emiddia Longobardi with:
Emiddia Longobardi Italy
Angela Tagini Italy
Marinella Majorano Italy
Sarah Kulkofsky United States
Mary K. Mullen United States
Federica Bianco Italy
Ina Faßbender Germany
Carmen Belacchi Italy
Kelly A. Marin United States
Azriel Grysman United States
Fiona Jack relative to Emiddia Longobardi Italy Emiddia Longobardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Emiddia Longobardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Jack. The network helps show where Fiona Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Jack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Jack Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Jack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009130
2 201096
3 201675
4 201360
5 201044
6 200741
7 201440
8 201139
9 201036
10 201323
11 201418
12 201617
13 201313
14 201511
15 20129
16 20197
17 20166
18 20154
19 20093
20
Improving childrens accuracy on target-absent lineups: Do the physical characteristics of the wildcard influence its success? -poster
20101

About Fiona Jack

Fiona Jack is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Radiology practices and education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (405 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (295 citations), Social Psychology (181 citations) and Clinical Psychology (145 citations). Fiona Jack has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Harlene Hayne, Elaine Reese, Rachel Zajac, Yan Chen, Naomi White, Qi Wang, Helena M. McAnally, Tia Neha, Gabrielle Simcock and William J. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Memory, Child Development, Psychology Crime and Law, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact