Fiona Dyer

2.4k citations
72 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Dyer

67 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Fiona Dyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Water Science and Technology 569
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 496
  • Ecology 703
  • Soil Science 196
  • Global and Planetary Change 359
Replace D. J. Booker with:
D. J. Booker New Zealand
Ian Overton Australia
Hervé Pella France
Jens Kiesel Germany
José Barquín Spain
Lisa C. Thompson United States
Melinda D. Daniels United States
Jeffrey J. Opperman United States
Sarah E. Null United States
Rafael Schmitt United States
Fiona Dyer relative to D. J. Booker New Zealand D. J. Booker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D. J. Booker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Dyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Dyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Dyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Dyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Dyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Dyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Dyer. The network helps show where Fiona Dyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Dyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Dyer Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Dyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014265
2
The structure, function and management implications of fluvial sedimentary systems
2002161
3 201578
4 201364
5 200760
6 201448
7 200636
8
Snapshot of the Murray- Darling Basin River Condition
200133
9 201930
10 201628
11 201826
12 200425
13 201324
14 201824
15 201723
16 201722
17 201721
18 202120
19 201620
20 202019

About Fiona Dyer

Fiona Dyer is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change and Soil Science, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (22 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (21 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (20 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (8 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (8 papers), Water resources management and optimization (7 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (569 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (496 citations), Ecology (703 citations), Soil Science (196 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (359 citations). Fiona Dyer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Martin C. Thoms, Jon Olley, William J. Young, Carmel Pollino, Mike Acreman, Carol A. Couch, Michael J. Stewardson, Angela H. Arthington, Matthew J. Colloff and N. D. Crossman. Their work appears in journals such as Marine and Freshwater Research, River Research and Applications, Ecohydrology, Water and Ecological Indicators.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact