Filip Ejdus

812 citations
47 papers · 549 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Filip Ejdus

39 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Filip Ejdus
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 331
  • Development 46
  • Sociology and Political Science 403
  • Cultural Studies 70
  • Space and Planetary Science 6
Replace Soner Çaǧaptay with:
Soner Çaǧaptay United States
Srdjan Vucetic Canada
Giorgio Shani Japan
H. W. Brands United States
Lerna K. Yanık Türkiye
Alexandra Barahona de Brito United Kingdom
Viatcheslav Morozov Estonia
Hakkı Taş Germany
Ahmet Erdi Öztürk United Kingdom
Güneş Murat Tezcür United States
Filip Ejdus relative to Soner Çaǧaptay United States Soner Çaǧaptay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Soner Çaǧaptay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Filip Ejdus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Filip Ejdus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filip Ejdus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filip Ejdus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Filip Ejdus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filip Ejdus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filip Ejdus. The network helps show where Filip Ejdus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Filip Ejdus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Filip Ejdus Line = papers co-authored together Filip Ejdus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017110
2 201756
3 201953
4 201742
5 201731
6 201728
7 201621
8 202120
9 201918
10 201416
11 201613
12 201713
13 202012
14 202011
15 202011
16 20149
17 20209
18 20169
19 20199
20 20246

About Filip Ejdus

Filip Ejdus is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Development and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peacebuilding and International Security (20 papers), Balkans: History, Politics, Society (16 papers), Global Security and Public Health (9 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (8 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (331 citations), Development (46 citations), Sociology and Political Science (403 citations), Cultural Studies (70 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (6 citations). Filip Ejdus has collaborated with scholars based in Serbia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ana E. Juncos, Jelena Subotić, Alaa Tartir, Adam Fagan, Kaja Damnjanović, Oliver Tošković and Dušan Pavlović. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Security Policy, Journal of International Relations and Development, International Relations, Problems of Post-Communism and European Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact