Fernando Aith

44 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Fernando Aith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Health 36
  • Pharmacy 13
  • General Health Professions 59
  • Law 24
Replace Laura Thomas with:
Laura Thomas Australia
Christoph Aluttis Netherlands
Sara Hossain United States
Sérgio Francisco Piola Brazil
Rama Baru India
Abbe R. Gluck United States
Sulamis Dain Brazil
Mario Hernández Colombia
Luisa Cabal United States
Carlos Octávio Ocké‐Reis Brazil
Fernando Aith relative to Laura Thomas Australia Laura Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Laura Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Aith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Aith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Aith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Aith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Aith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Aith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Aith. The network helps show where Fernando Aith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Aith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Aith Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Aith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201735
2 201425
3 202115
4 202214
5 202214
6 201614
7 202112
8 20159
9 20099
10 20147
11 20137
12 20207
13 20205
14 20155
15 20155
16 20205
17 20194
18 20184
19 20204
20 20144

About Fernando Aith

Fernando Aith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Law, Pharmacy and Demography, having authored 49 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Health in Brazil (24 papers), Brazilian Legal Issues (11 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (9 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (5 papers), Human Rights and Development (5 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (7 citations), Health (36 citations), Pharmacy (13 citations), General Health Professions (59 citations) and Law (24 citations). Fernando Aith has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sueli Gandolfi Dallari, Márcia Thereza Couto, Carolina Luísa Alves Barbieri, Deisy de Freitas Lima Ventura, Rossana Reis, Ana Cláudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani, Beatriz Helena Tess, Maria Aparecida Shikanai‐Yasuda, Nivaldo Carneiro and Marília Cristina Prado Louvison. Their work appears in journals such as Revista de Saúde Pública, Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva and Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact